‘DOOM 3’ after 20 years: Not the threequel we expected, but still an essential FPS

As we eagerly await Doom: The Dark Ages, which will hopefully arrive in 2025, many diehard fans are replaying the entire Doom. Twenty years later, Doom 3 continues to be an inflection point for the franchise, and gamers still can’t agree on whether it was great or a disappointment. What if it was a bit of both? I’ve returned to the dark corridors of the UAC’s Mars base to re-evaluate the threequel.

When we did our list of all the Doom games ranked, Doom 3 came in last despite its 87 Metacritic score and all the praise it’s received over the years. While it might seem like we think it’s a bad game, our opinion is quite the opposite. The Doom series is so great and consistent that even the ‘least awesome’ entry is heads and shoulders above other big first-person shooters. Looking at the larger picture, Doom 3 was an experiment for id Software beyond the graphical presentation. With the OG Doom formula more than exhausted by the early 2000s (although fans and modders love it to this day), everyone should’ve seen a rework of the formula coming.

Source link

Read our previous article: NBA on Christmas Day: Victor Wembanyama’s dominance, 76ers’ potential and other key takeaways

Sports Update: You're still running through demon-infested uac facilities, gunning down possessed humans and monstrosities in dark corridors and science-y areas.neither the world-building nor the gameplay are very different, and this new doomguy feels more human than ever before Stay tuned for more updates on ‘DOOM 3’ after 20 years: Not the threequel we expected, but still an essential FPS and other trending sports news!

Your Thoughts Matter! What’s your opinion on ‘DOOM 3’ after 20 years: Not the threequel we expected, but still an essential FPS? Share your thoughts in the comments below and join the discussion!

Leave a Comment